I misinterpreted some code as a risk of entity loss, but now
after deeper study, I see how that code was used more and why
it was adding entities to chunks that they shouldn't have been
in during a world transfer process.
also ensure we never process already valid entities. this shouldnt be possible as of recent
commits as we made the entity slice array safer, but doesn't hurt for this logic to be safe too
incase that patch got dropped in a future version by accident/necessarily
1) Chunk Registration might kill an entity, don't add it to the world if it did!
2) By default, entities are added to the world per slice iteration.
This opens risk of the slices being manipulated during chunk add if an
EntityAddToWorldEvent spawns an entity into this chunk.
Fix this by differing entity add to world for all entities at the same time
3) If a duplicate entity is attempted to add to the world of an entity, and
the original entity is dead, overwrite it as the logic does for unloaod queued entities.
Should hopefully finish up issues with #1223
* master:
MC-135506: Experience should save as Integers
Fix EXP orb merging causing values to go negative - Closes#1169
Add "Safe Regen" Duplicate UUID resolver and make default
After witnessing behavior of the regeneration logs, its clear that Vanilla
has had bugs with saving duplicate entities for a while....
Some entities are saved in multiple chunks, and now we are bringing those duplicates
out that use to never surface.
This mode will analyze if the entity appears to be a duplicate (near the other dupe uuid)
and delete the entity instead.
This should reduce regenerations to entities that are nowhere near each other, and
therefore more likely to be subject to real UUID collisions due to our
previous bug, and therefor should survive the chunk load.
Fixes GH-1295
Non-standard sized portals exacerbate a flaw in the vanilla
portal teleportation adjustment logic.
As a result, an entity can end up slightly inside of the surrounding
portal blocks. In vanilla, this issue is minor and you are adjusted out
as if it never happened. In CraftBukkit and derivatives, the
anti-suffocation behavior activates and players end up teleported on top
of their portals.
This improves the offset so as to keep the issue from ever occurring in
the first place.
Special thanks to CarpetMod who appears to have had this fixed for some
time, and has licensed their code such that we can use it as needed.
Due to the changes in 1.13, clients will send a tab completion request
for all bukkit commands in order to factor in the lack of support for
brigadier and provide backwards support in the API.
Craftbukkit, however; has moved the chat spam limiter to also interact
with the tab completion request, which while good for avoiding abuse,
causes 1.13 clients to easilly be kicked from a server in bukkit due
to this. Removing the spam limit could cause issues for servers, however,
there is no way for servers to manipulate this without blindly cancelling
kick events, which only causes additional complications. This also causes
issues in that the tab spam limit and chat share the same field but different
limits, meaning that a player having typed a long command may be kicked from
the server.
Splitting the field up and making it configurable allows for server owners
to take the burden of this into their own hand without having to rely on
plugins doing unsafe things.
This patch has been applied to 1.12.2 in order to allow people using
plugins which allow clients of newer versions to connect, this is
not a common practice, however is being done as a level of nicety
given the current status of 1.13
We have a result boolean for this already, and this
method was meant to be "Try from cache, if that fails, look it up"
So NPE'ing there just wasn't correct.
In 1.13 the method previously used now returns translatable keys.
`block.minecraft.cobblestone` instead of `Cobblestone`
We just need to make sure we're translating those keys.
ideally this should of never mattered, as it will only
be hit if you teleport out of an unloaded chunk...
But apparently some people are triggering this.
See #1223
