Paper/Spigot-Server-Patches/0238-Disable-Explicit-Network-Manager-Flushing.patch
Aikar b62dfa0bf9
Updated Upstream (Bukkit/CraftBukkit)
Upstream has released updates that appears to apply and compile correctly.
This update has not been tested by PaperMC and as with ANY update, please do your own testing

Bukkit Changes:
39ce5d3a SPIGOT-4399: ItemMeta.equals broken with AttributeModifiers

CraftBukkit Changes:
1cf8b5dc SPIGOT-4400: Populators running on existing chunks
116cb9a1 SPIGOT-4399: Add attribute modifier equality test
5ee1c18a SPIGOT-4398: Set ASM7_EXPERIMENTAL flag
2018-09-28 19:31:59 -04:00

38 Zeilen
1.7 KiB
Diff

From 282ddad68b63ce73482aaad7d34013853af32289 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aikar <aikar@aikar.co>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 14:13:33 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Disable Explicit Network Manager Flushing
This seems completely pointless, as packet dispatch uses .writeAndFlush.
Things seem to work fine without explicit flushing, but incase issues arise,
provide a System property to re-enable it using improved logic of doing the
flushing on the netty event loop, so it won't do the flush on the main thread.
Renable flushing by passing -Dpaper.explicit-flush=true
diff --git a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/NetworkManager.java b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/NetworkManager.java
index 4f3f88ff66..f8facddb40 100644
--- a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/NetworkManager.java
+++ b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/NetworkManager.java
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ public class NetworkManager extends SimpleChannelInboundHandler<Packet<?>> {
// Paper start - NetworkClient implementation
public int protocolVersion;
public java.net.InetSocketAddress virtualHost;
+ private static boolean enableExplicitFlush = Boolean.getBoolean("paper.explicit-flush");
// Paper end
public NetworkManager(EnumProtocolDirection enumprotocoldirection) {
@@ -238,7 +239,7 @@ public class NetworkManager extends SimpleChannelInboundHandler<Packet<?>> {
}
if (this.channel != null) {
- this.channel.flush();
+ if (enableExplicitFlush) this.channel.eventLoop().execute(() -> this.channel.flush()); // Paper - we don't need to explicit flush here, but allow opt in incase issues are found to a better version
}
if (this.u++ % 20 == 0) {
--
2.19.0