13
0
geforkt von Mirrors/Paper
Paper/patches/server/0427-Fix-client-lag-on-advancement-loading.patch
Bjarne Koll c5a10665b8
Remove wall-time / unused skip tick protection (#11412)
Spigot still maintains some partial implementation of "tick skipping", a
practice in which the MinecraftServer.currentTick field is updated not
by an increment of one per actual tick, but instead set to
System.currentTimeMillis() / 50. This behaviour means that the tracked
tick may "skip" a tick value in case a previous tick took more than the
expected 50ms.

To compensate for this in important paths, spigot/craftbukkit
implements "wall-time". Instead of incrementing/decrementing ticks on
block entities/entities by one for each call to their tick() method,
they instead increment/decrement important values, like
an ItemEntity's age or pickupDelay, by the difference of
`currentTick - lastTick`, where `lastTick` is the value of
`currentTick` during the last tick() call.

These "fixes" however do not play nicely with minecraft's simulation
distance as entities/block entities implementing the above behaviour
would "catch up" their values when moving from a non-ticking chunk to a
ticking one as their `lastTick` value remains stuck on the last tick in
a ticking chunk and hence lead to a large "catch up" once ticked again.

Paper completely removes the "tick skipping" behaviour (See patch
"Further-improve-server-tick-loop"), making the above precautions
completely unnecessary, which also rids paper of the previous described
incompatibility with non-ticking chunks.
2024-09-19 16:36:07 +02:00

36 Zeilen
2.0 KiB
Diff

From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Penilla <11360596+jpenilla@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:49:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix client lag on advancement loading
When new advancements are added via the UnsafeValues#loadAdvancement
API, it triggers a full datapack reload when this is not necessary. The
advancement is already loaded directly into the advancement registry,
and the point of saving the advancement to the Bukkit datapack seems to
be for persistence. By removing the call to reload datapacks when an
advancement is loaded, the client no longer completely freezes up when
adding a new advancement.
To ensure the client still receives the updated advancement data, we
manually reload the advancement data for all players, which
normally takes place as a part of the datapack reloading.
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/util/CraftMagicNumbers.java b/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/util/CraftMagicNumbers.java
index a557b40e1807933cf510ea489ebcab4a19c066c1..481aeb922952578ea68ce2425c84e1a93eff0cf9 100644
--- a/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/util/CraftMagicNumbers.java
+++ b/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/util/CraftMagicNumbers.java
@@ -317,7 +317,13 @@ public final class CraftMagicNumbers implements UnsafeValues {
Bukkit.getLogger().log(Level.SEVERE, "Error saving advancement " + key, ex);
}
- MinecraftServer.getServer().getPlayerList().reloadResources();
+ // Paper start - Fix client lag on advancement loading
+ //MinecraftServer.getServer().getPlayerList().reload();
+ MinecraftServer.getServer().getPlayerList().getPlayers().forEach(player -> {
+ player.getAdvancements().reload(MinecraftServer.getServer().getAdvancements());
+ player.getAdvancements().flushDirty(player);
+ });
+ // Paper end - Fix client lag on advancement loading
return bukkit;
}