13
0
geforkt von Mirrors/Paper
Paper/patches/server/0679-Implement-enchantWithLevels-API.patch
Bjarne Koll c5a10665b8
Remove wall-time / unused skip tick protection (#11412)
Spigot still maintains some partial implementation of "tick skipping", a
practice in which the MinecraftServer.currentTick field is updated not
by an increment of one per actual tick, but instead set to
System.currentTimeMillis() / 50. This behaviour means that the tracked
tick may "skip" a tick value in case a previous tick took more than the
expected 50ms.

To compensate for this in important paths, spigot/craftbukkit
implements "wall-time". Instead of incrementing/decrementing ticks on
block entities/entities by one for each call to their tick() method,
they instead increment/decrement important values, like
an ItemEntity's age or pickupDelay, by the difference of
`currentTick - lastTick`, where `lastTick` is the value of
`currentTick` during the last tick() call.

These "fixes" however do not play nicely with minecraft's simulation
distance as entities/block entities implementing the above behaviour
would "catch up" their values when moving from a non-ticking chunk to a
ticking one as their `lastTick` value remains stuck on the last tick in
a ticking chunk and hence lead to a large "catch up" once ticked again.

Paper completely removes the "tick skipping" behaviour (See patch
"Further-improve-server-tick-loop"), making the above precautions
completely unnecessary, which also rids paper of the previous described
incompatibility with non-ticking chunks.
2024-09-19 16:36:07 +02:00

46 Zeilen
3.0 KiB
Diff

From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Penilla <11360596+jpenilla@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 20:35:21 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Implement enchantWithLevels API
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/inventory/CraftItemFactory.java b/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/inventory/CraftItemFactory.java
index 803a19063c03627dbea79cb1c395ae35aaef2834..317af98f8bd166a5a534f74e6ba177be9afb6a8f 100644
--- a/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/inventory/CraftItemFactory.java
+++ b/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/inventory/CraftItemFactory.java
@@ -302,4 +302,34 @@ public final class CraftItemFactory implements ItemFactory {
return eggItem == null ? null : new net.minecraft.world.item.ItemStack(eggItem).asBukkitMirror();
}
// Paper end - old getSpawnEgg API
+ // Paper start - enchantWithLevels API
+ @Override
+ public ItemStack enchantWithLevels(ItemStack itemStack, int levels, boolean allowTreasure, java.util.Random random) {
+ Preconditions.checkArgument(itemStack != null, "Argument 'itemStack' must not be null");
+ Preconditions.checkArgument(itemStack.getType() != Material.AIR, "Argument 'itemStack' must not be of type AIR");
+ Preconditions.checkArgument(itemStack.getAmount() > 0, "Argument 'itemStack' amount must be greater than 0");
+ Preconditions.checkArgument(levels > 0 && levels <= 30, "Argument 'levels' must be in range [1, 30] (attempted " + levels + ")");
+ Preconditions.checkArgument(random != null, "Argument 'random' must not be null");
+ final net.minecraft.world.item.ItemStack internalStack = CraftItemStack.asNMSCopy(itemStack);
+ if (internalStack.isEnchanted()) {
+ internalStack.set(net.minecraft.core.component.DataComponents.ENCHANTMENTS, null);
+ }
+ final net.minecraft.core.RegistryAccess registryAccess = net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.getServer().registryAccess();
+ final net.minecraft.core.Registry<Enchantment> enchantments = registryAccess.registryOrThrow(Registries.ENCHANTMENT);
+ final net.minecraft.world.item.ItemStack enchanted = net.minecraft.world.item.enchantment.EnchantmentHelper.enchantItem(
+ new org.bukkit.craftbukkit.util.RandomSourceWrapper(random),
+ internalStack,
+ levels,
+ registryAccess,
+ allowTreasure
+ ? Optional.empty()
+ // While IN_ENCHANTING_TABLE is not logically the same as all but TREASURE, the tag is defined as
+ // NON_TREASURE, which does contain all enchantments not in the treasure tag.
+ // Additionally, the allowTreasure boolean is more intended to configure this method to behave like
+ // an enchanting table.
+ : registryAccess.registryOrThrow(Registries.ENCHANTMENT).getTag(EnchantmentTags.IN_ENCHANTING_TABLE)
+ );
+ return CraftItemStack.asCraftMirror(enchanted);
+ }
+ // Paper end - enchantWithLevels API
}