Archiviert
13
0
Dieses Repository wurde am 2024-12-25 archiviert. Du kannst Dateien ansehen und es klonen, aber nicht pushen oder Issues/Pull-Requests öffnen.
Paper-Old/Spigot-Server-Patches/0273-Disable-Explicit-Network-Manager-Flushing.patch
Minecrell e15167251b Add extended PaperServerListPingEvent (#980)
* Drop original implementation for old player sample API

* Add extended PaperServerListPingEvent

Add a new event that extends the original ServerListPingEvent
and allows full control of the response sent to the client.

* Implement deprecated player sample API
2018-03-22 23:19:59 -04:00

38 Zeilen
1.6 KiB
Diff

From 9e1c5a7852f21efbc2bc259be9eb5b3a567f3b9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aikar <aikar@aikar.co>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 14:13:33 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Disable Explicit Network Manager Flushing
This seems completely pointless, as packet dispatch uses .writeAndFlush.
Things seem to work fine without explicit flushing, but incase issues arise,
provide a System property to re-enable it using improved logic of doing the
flushing on the netty event loop, so it won't do the flush on the main thread.
Renable flushing by passing -Dpaper.explicit-flush=true
diff --git a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/NetworkManager.java b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/NetworkManager.java
index b93a26e8f..3d32e0056 100644
--- a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/NetworkManager.java
+++ b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/NetworkManager.java
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ public class NetworkManager extends SimpleChannelInboundHandler<Packet<?>> {
// Paper start - NetworkClient implementation
public int protocolVersion;
public java.net.InetSocketAddress virtualHost;
+ private static boolean enableExplicitFlush = Boolean.getBoolean("paper.explicit-flush");
// Paper end
public NetworkManager(EnumProtocolDirection enumprotocoldirection) {
@@ -255,7 +256,7 @@ public class NetworkManager extends SimpleChannelInboundHandler<Packet<?>> {
}
if (this.channel != null) {
- this.channel.flush();
+ if (enableExplicitFlush) this.channel.eventLoop().execute(() -> this.channel.flush()); // Paper - we don't need to explicit flush here, but allow opt in incase issues are found to a better version
}
}
--
2.16.2