SteamWar/Paper-Old
Archiviert
13
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull-Requests Projekte Releases Wiki Aktivität
Dieses Repository wurde am 2024-12-25 archiviert. Du kannst Dateien ansehen und es klonen, aber nicht pushen oder Issues/Pull-Requests öffnen.
e091466f34
Paper-Old/disabled-patches/0090-Optimize-Chunk-Unload-Queue.patch

280 Zeilen
13 KiB
Diff
Originalformat Normale Ansicht Verlauf

Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
From f3feb831b366194cd979e43409b6c0180cfbd58f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Optimize Chunk Unload Queue Removing chunks from the unload queue when performing chunk lookups is a costly activity. It drastically slows down server performance as many methods call getChunkAt, resulting in a bandaid to skip removing chunks from the unload queue. This patch optimizes the unload queue to instead use a boolean on the Chunk object itself to mark if the chunk is active, and then insert into a LinkedList queue. The benefits here is that all chunk unload queue actions are now O(1) constant time. A LinkedList will never need to resize, and can be removed from in constant time when used in a queue like method. We mark the chunk as active in many places that notify it is still being used, so that when the chunk unload queue reaches that chunk, and sees the chunk became active again, it will skip it and move to next.
2016-03-18 23:03:44 +01:00
From: Aikar <aikar@aikar.co>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:57:25 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Optimize Chunk Unload Queue
Removing chunks from the unload queue when performing chunk lookups is a costly activity.
It drastically slows down server performance as many methods call getChunkAt, resulting in a bandaid
to skip removing chunks from the unload queue.
This patch optimizes the unload queue to instead use a boolean on the Chunk object itself to mark
if the chunk is active, and then insert into a LinkedList queue.
The benefits here is that all chunk unload queue actions are now O(1) constant time.
A LinkedList will never need to resize, and can be removed from in constant time when
used in a queue like method.
We mark the chunk as active in many places that notify it is still being used, so that
when the chunk unload queue reaches that chunk, and sees the chunk became active again,
it will skip it and move to next.
diff --git a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/Chunk.java b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/Chunk.java
index b6d84d7..a4c0b4e 100644
--- a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/Chunk.java
+++ b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/Chunk.java
@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ public class Chunk {
// Keep this synced with entitySlices.add() and entitySlices.remove()
private final int[] itemCounts = new int[16];
private final int[] inventoryEntityCounts = new int[16];
+ public boolean isChunkActive = true;
+ public boolean isInUnloadQueue = false;
// Paper end
// CraftBukkit start - Neighbor loaded cache for chunk lighting and entity ticking
@@ -780,6 +782,7 @@ public class Chunk {
}
public void addEntities() {
+ isChunkActive = true; // Paper
this.i = true;
this.world.b(this.tileEntities.values());
@@ -798,6 +801,7 @@ public class Chunk {
}
public void removeEntities() {
+ isChunkActive = false; // Paper
this.i = false;
Iterator iterator = this.tileEntities.values().iterator();
diff --git a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/ChunkProviderServer.java b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/ChunkProviderServer.java
Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
index 9ef6246..f696e27 100644
Optimize Chunk Unload Queue Removing chunks from the unload queue when performing chunk lookups is a costly activity. It drastically slows down server performance as many methods call getChunkAt, resulting in a bandaid to skip removing chunks from the unload queue. This patch optimizes the unload queue to instead use a boolean on the Chunk object itself to mark if the chunk is active, and then insert into a LinkedList queue. The benefits here is that all chunk unload queue actions are now O(1) constant time. A LinkedList will never need to resize, and can be removed from in constant time when used in a queue like method. We mark the chunk as active in many places that notify it is still being used, so that when the chunk unload queue reaches that chunk, and sees the chunk became active again, it will skip it and move to next.
2016-03-18 23:03:44 +01:00
--- a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/ChunkProviderServer.java
+++ b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/ChunkProviderServer.java
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ import org.bukkit.event.world.ChunkUnloadEvent;
public class ChunkProviderServer implements IChunkProvider {
private static final Logger a = LogManager.getLogger();
- public final LongHashSet unloadQueue = new LongHashSet(); // CraftBukkit - LongHashSet
+ public final ChunkUnloadQueue unloadQueue = new ChunkUnloadQueue(); // CraftBukkit - LongHashSet // Paper -> ChunkUnloadQueue
public final ChunkGenerator chunkGenerator; // CraftBukkit - public
private final IChunkLoader chunkLoader;
public LongObjectHashMap<Chunk> chunks = new LongObjectHashMap<Chunk>(); // CraftBukkit
Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
@@ -79,18 +79,27 @@ public class ChunkProviderServer implements IChunkProvider {
Optimize Chunk Unload Queue Removing chunks from the unload queue when performing chunk lookups is a costly activity. It drastically slows down server performance as many methods call getChunkAt, resulting in a bandaid to skip removing chunks from the unload queue. This patch optimizes the unload queue to instead use a boolean on the Chunk object itself to mark if the chunk is active, and then insert into a LinkedList queue. The benefits here is that all chunk unload queue actions are now O(1) constant time. A LinkedList will never need to resize, and can be removed from in constant time when used in a queue like method. We mark the chunk as active in many places that notify it is still being used, so that when the chunk unload queue reaches that chunk, and sees the chunk became active again, it will skip it and move to next.
2016-03-18 23:03:44 +01:00
// CraftBukkit start - Add async variant, provide compatibility
public Chunk getOrCreateChunkFast(int x, int z) {
- Chunk chunk = chunks.get(LongHash.toLong(x, z));
- return (chunk == null) ? getChunkAt(x, z) : chunk;
+ return getChunkAt(x, z); // Paper
Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
+ }
+
Fix chunk unload issues - Resolves #97
2016-03-19 16:29:46 +01:00
+ // Paper start
+ public Chunk getLoadedChunkAtWithoutMarkingActive(int i, int j) {
+ return chunks.get(LongHash.toLong(i, j));
Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
}
- public Chunk getChunkIfLoaded(int x, int z) {
Optimize Chunk Unload Queue Removing chunks from the unload queue when performing chunk lookups is a costly activity. It drastically slows down server performance as many methods call getChunkAt, resulting in a bandaid to skip removing chunks from the unload queue. This patch optimizes the unload queue to instead use a boolean on the Chunk object itself to mark if the chunk is active, and then insert into a LinkedList queue. The benefits here is that all chunk unload queue actions are now O(1) constant time. A LinkedList will never need to resize, and can be removed from in constant time when used in a queue like method. We mark the chunk as active in many places that notify it is still being used, so that when the chunk unload queue reaches that chunk, and sees the chunk became active again, it will skip it and move to next.
2016-03-18 23:03:44 +01:00
- return chunks.get(LongHash.toLong(x, z));
Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
+ // getChunkIfLoaded -> getChunkIfActive
+ // this is only used by CraftBukkit now, and plugins shouldnt mark things active
+ public Chunk getChunkIfActive(int x, int z) {
+ Chunk chunk = chunks.get(LongHash.toLong(x, z));
+ return (chunk != null && chunk.isChunkActive) ? chunk : null;
Optimize Chunk Unload Queue Removing chunks from the unload queue when performing chunk lookups is a costly activity. It drastically slows down server performance as many methods call getChunkAt, resulting in a bandaid to skip removing chunks from the unload queue. This patch optimizes the unload queue to instead use a boolean on the Chunk object itself to mark if the chunk is active, and then insert into a LinkedList queue. The benefits here is that all chunk unload queue actions are now O(1) constant time. A LinkedList will never need to resize, and can be removed from in constant time when used in a queue like method. We mark the chunk as active in many places that notify it is still being used, so that when the chunk unload queue reaches that chunk, and sees the chunk became active again, it will skip it and move to next.
2016-03-18 23:03:44 +01:00
}
Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
+ // Paper end
Optimize Chunk Unload Queue Removing chunks from the unload queue when performing chunk lookups is a costly activity. It drastically slows down server performance as many methods call getChunkAt, resulting in a bandaid to skip removing chunks from the unload queue. This patch optimizes the unload queue to instead use a boolean on the Chunk object itself to mark if the chunk is active, and then insert into a LinkedList queue. The benefits here is that all chunk unload queue actions are now O(1) constant time. A LinkedList will never need to resize, and can be removed from in constant time when used in a queue like method. We mark the chunk as active in many places that notify it is still being used, so that when the chunk unload queue reaches that chunk, and sees the chunk became active again, it will skip it and move to next.
2016-03-18 23:03:44 +01:00
public Chunk getLoadedChunkAt(int i, int j) {
Chunk chunk = chunks.get(LongHash.toLong(i, j)); // CraftBukkit
this.unloadQueue.remove(i, j); // CraftBukkit
+ if (chunk != null) { chunk.isChunkActive = true; }// Paper
return chunk;
}
Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
@@ -151,6 +160,7 @@ public class ChunkProviderServer implements IChunkProvider {
Optimize Chunk Unload Queue Removing chunks from the unload queue when performing chunk lookups is a costly activity. It drastically slows down server performance as many methods call getChunkAt, resulting in a bandaid to skip removing chunks from the unload queue. This patch optimizes the unload queue to instead use a boolean on the Chunk object itself to mark if the chunk is active, and then insert into a LinkedList queue. The benefits here is that all chunk unload queue actions are now O(1) constant time. A LinkedList will never need to resize, and can be removed from in constant time when used in a queue like method. We mark the chunk as active in many places that notify it is still being used, so that when the chunk unload queue reaches that chunk, and sees the chunk became active again, it will skip it and move to next.
2016-03-18 23:03:44 +01:00
runnable.run();
}
+ chunk.isChunkActive = true; // Paper
return chunk;
}
Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
@@ -201,7 +211,7 @@ public class ChunkProviderServer implements IChunkProvider {
Fix chunk unload issues - Resolves #97
2016-03-19 16:29:46 +01:00
continue;
}
- Chunk neighbor = this.getChunkIfLoaded(chunk.locX + x, chunk.locZ + z);
+ Chunk neighbor = this.getLoadedChunkAtWithoutMarkingActive(chunk.locX + x, chunk.locZ + z); // Paper
if (neighbor != null) {
neighbor.setNeighborLoaded(-x, -z);
chunk.setNeighborLoaded(x, z);
Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
@@ -300,10 +310,17 @@ public class ChunkProviderServer implements IChunkProvider {
Optimize Chunk Unload Queue Removing chunks from the unload queue when performing chunk lookups is a costly activity. It drastically slows down server performance as many methods call getChunkAt, resulting in a bandaid to skip removing chunks from the unload queue. This patch optimizes the unload queue to instead use a boolean on the Chunk object itself to mark if the chunk is active, and then insert into a LinkedList queue. The benefits here is that all chunk unload queue actions are now O(1) constant time. A LinkedList will never need to resize, and can be removed from in constant time when used in a queue like method. We mark the chunk as active in many places that notify it is still being used, so that when the chunk unload queue reaches that chunk, and sees the chunk became active again, it will skip it and move to next.
2016-03-18 23:03:44 +01:00
if (!this.world.savingDisabled) {
// CraftBukkit start
Server server = this.world.getServer();
- for (int i = 0; i < 100 && !this.unloadQueue.isEmpty(); ++i) {
- long chunkcoordinates = this.unloadQueue.popFirst();
- Chunk chunk = this.chunks.get(chunkcoordinates);
- if (chunk == null) continue;
+ // Paper start
+ final Iterator<Chunk> iterator = this.unloadQueue.iterator();
+ for (int i = 0; i < 100 && iterator.hasNext(); ++i) {
+ Chunk chunk = iterator.next();
+ iterator.remove();
+ long chunkcoordinates = LongHash.toLong(chunk.locX, chunk.locZ);
+ chunk.isInUnloadQueue = false;
+ if (chunk.isChunkActive) {
+ continue;
+ }
+ // Paper end
ChunkUnloadEvent event = new ChunkUnloadEvent(chunk.bukkitChunk);
server.getPluginManager().callEvent(event);
Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
@@ -325,7 +342,7 @@ public class ChunkProviderServer implements IChunkProvider {
Fix chunk unload issues - Resolves #97
2016-03-19 16:29:46 +01:00
continue;
}
- Chunk neighbor = this.getChunkIfLoaded(chunk.locX + x, chunk.locZ + z);
+ Chunk neighbor = this.getLoadedChunkAtWithoutMarkingActive(chunk.locX + x, chunk.locZ + z); // Paper
if (neighbor != null) {
neighbor.setNeighborUnloaded(-x, -z);
chunk.setNeighborUnloaded(x, z);
Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
@@ -367,4 +384,22 @@ public class ChunkProviderServer implements IChunkProvider {
Optimize Chunk Unload Queue Removing chunks from the unload queue when performing chunk lookups is a costly activity. It drastically slows down server performance as many methods call getChunkAt, resulting in a bandaid to skip removing chunks from the unload queue. This patch optimizes the unload queue to instead use a boolean on the Chunk object itself to mark if the chunk is active, and then insert into a LinkedList queue. The benefits here is that all chunk unload queue actions are now O(1) constant time. A LinkedList will never need to resize, and can be removed from in constant time when used in a queue like method. We mark the chunk as active in many places that notify it is still being used, so that when the chunk unload queue reaches that chunk, and sees the chunk became active again, it will skip it and move to next.
2016-03-18 23:03:44 +01:00
public boolean e(int i, int j) {
return this.chunks.containsKey(LongHash.toLong(i, j)); // CraftBukkit
}
+
+ // Paper start
+ public class ChunkUnloadQueue extends java.util.LinkedList<Chunk> {
+ public void remove(int x, int z) {
+ // nothing! Just to reduce diff
+ }
+ public void add(int x, int z) {
+ final Chunk chunk = chunks.get(LongHash.toLong(x, z));
+ if (chunk != null) {
+ chunk.isChunkActive = false;
+ if (!chunk.isInUnloadQueue) {
+ chunk.isInUnloadQueue = true;
+ add(chunk);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ // Paper end
}
diff --git a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/SpawnerCreature.java b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/SpawnerCreature.java
index 63e118d..721bcae 100644
--- a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/SpawnerCreature.java
+++ b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/SpawnerCreature.java
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ public final class SpawnerCreature {
Long coord = it.next();
int x = LongHash.msw( coord );
int z = LongHash.lsw( coord );
- if ( !((ChunkProviderServer)server.chunkProvider).unloadQueue.contains( coord ) && server.isChunkLoaded( x, z, true ) )
+ if ( server.isChunkLoaded( x, z, true ) ) // Paper
{
i += server.getChunkAt( x, z ).entityCount.get( oClass );
}
Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
diff --git a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/World.java b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/World.java
index b356aa6..f996c53 100644
--- a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/World.java
+++ b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/World.java
@@ -157,9 +157,15 @@ public abstract class World implements IBlockAccess {
}
public Chunk getChunkIfLoaded(int x, int z) {
- return ((ChunkProviderServer) this.chunkProvider).getChunkIfLoaded(x, z);
+ return ((ChunkProviderServer) this.chunkProvider).getLoadedChunkAtWithoutMarkingActive(x, z); // Paper - This is added by CB, and will not mark as active. Simply an alias
}
+ // Paper start
+ public Chunk getChunkIfActive(int x, int z) {
+ return ((ChunkProviderServer) this.chunkProvider).getChunkIfActive(x, z);
+ }
+ // Paper end
+
protected World(IDataManager idatamanager, WorldData worlddata, WorldProvider worldprovider, MethodProfiler methodprofiler, boolean flag, ChunkGenerator gen, org.bukkit.World.Environment env) {
this.spigotConfig = new org.spigotmc.SpigotWorldConfig( worlddata.getName() ); // Spigot
this.paperConfig = new com.destroystokyo.paper.PaperWorldConfig(worlddata.getName(), this.spigotConfig); // Paper
Optimize Chunk Unload Queue Removing chunks from the unload queue when performing chunk lookups is a costly activity. It drastically slows down server performance as many methods call getChunkAt, resulting in a bandaid to skip removing chunks from the unload queue. This patch optimizes the unload queue to instead use a boolean on the Chunk object itself to mark if the chunk is active, and then insert into a LinkedList queue. The benefits here is that all chunk unload queue actions are now O(1) constant time. A LinkedList will never need to resize, and can be removed from in constant time when used in a queue like method. We mark the chunk as active in many places that notify it is still being used, so that when the chunk unload queue reaches that chunk, and sees the chunk became active again, it will skip it and move to next.
2016-03-18 23:03:44 +01:00
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/CraftWorld.java b/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/CraftWorld.java
Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
index be311cd..c0c642e 100644
Optimize Chunk Unload Queue Removing chunks from the unload queue when performing chunk lookups is a costly activity. It drastically slows down server performance as many methods call getChunkAt, resulting in a bandaid to skip removing chunks from the unload queue. This patch optimizes the unload queue to instead use a boolean on the Chunk object itself to mark if the chunk is active, and then insert into a LinkedList queue. The benefits here is that all chunk unload queue actions are now O(1) constant time. A LinkedList will never need to resize, and can be removed from in constant time when used in a queue like method. We mark the chunk as active in many places that notify it is still being used, so that when the chunk unload queue reaches that chunk, and sees the chunk became active again, it will skip it and move to next.
2016-03-18 23:03:44 +01:00
--- a/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/CraftWorld.java
+++ b/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/CraftWorld.java
Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ public class CraftWorld implements World {
}
// Paper start - Don't create a chunk just to unload it
- net.minecraft.server.Chunk chunk = world.getChunkProviderServer().getChunkIfLoaded(x, z);
+ net.minecraft.server.Chunk chunk = world.getChunkProviderServer().getChunkIfActive(x, z); // Paper
if (chunk == null) {
return false;
}
Fix chunk unload issues - Resolves #97
2016-03-19 16:29:46 +01:00
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ public class CraftWorld implements World {
continue;
}
- net.minecraft.server.Chunk neighbor = world.getChunkProviderServer().getChunkIfLoaded(chunk.locX + x, chunk.locZ + z);
+ net.minecraft.server.Chunk neighbor = world.getChunkProviderServer().getLoadedChunkAtWithoutMarkingActive(chunk.locX + x, chunk.locZ + z); // Paper
if (neighbor != null) {
neighbor.setNeighborUnloaded(-xx, -zz);
chunk.setNeighborUnloaded(xx, zz);
Optimize Chunk Unload Queue Removing chunks from the unload queue when performing chunk lookups is a costly activity. It drastically slows down server performance as many methods call getChunkAt, resulting in a bandaid to skip removing chunks from the unload queue. This patch optimizes the unload queue to instead use a boolean on the Chunk object itself to mark if the chunk is active, and then insert into a LinkedList queue. The benefits here is that all chunk unload queue actions are now O(1) constant time. A LinkedList will never need to resize, and can be removed from in constant time when used in a queue like method. We mark the chunk as active in many places that notify it is still being used, so that when the chunk unload queue reaches that chunk, and sees the chunk became active again, it will skip it and move to next.
2016-03-18 23:03:44 +01:00
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ public class CraftWorld implements World {
world.timings.syncChunkLoadTimer.startTiming(); // Spigot
chunk = world.getChunkProviderServer().getOrLoadChunkAt(x, z);
world.timings.syncChunkLoadTimer.stopTiming(); // Spigot
- }
+ } else { chunk.isChunkActive = true; } // Paper
return chunk != null;
}
Fix chunk unload issues - Resolves #97
2016-03-19 16:29:46 +01:00
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ public class CraftWorld implements World {
continue;
}
- net.minecraft.server.Chunk neighbor = world.getChunkProviderServer().getChunkIfLoaded(chunk.locX + x, chunk.locZ + z);
+ net.minecraft.server.Chunk neighbor = world.getChunkProviderServer().getLoadedChunkAtWithoutMarkingActive(chunk.locX + x, chunk.locZ + z); // Paper
if (neighbor != null) {
neighbor.setNeighborLoaded(-x, -z);
chunk.setNeighborLoaded(x, z);
Optimize Chunk Unload Queue Removing chunks from the unload queue when performing chunk lookups is a costly activity. It drastically slows down server performance as many methods call getChunkAt, resulting in a bandaid to skip removing chunks from the unload queue. This patch optimizes the unload queue to instead use a boolean on the Chunk object itself to mark if the chunk is active, and then insert into a LinkedList queue. The benefits here is that all chunk unload queue actions are now O(1) constant time. A LinkedList will never need to resize, and can be removed from in constant time when used in a queue like method. We mark the chunk as active in many places that notify it is still being used, so that when the chunk unload queue reaches that chunk, and sees the chunk became active again, it will skip it and move to next.
2016-03-18 23:03:44 +01:00
@@ -1538,7 +1538,7 @@ public class CraftWorld implements World {
}
// Already unloading?
- if (cps.unloadQueue.contains(chunk.locX, chunk.locZ)) {
+ if (!chunk.isChunkActive) { // Paper
continue;
}
Fix chunk unload issues - Resolves #97
2016-03-19 16:29:46 +01:00
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/chunkio/ChunkIOProvider.java b/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/chunkio/ChunkIOProvider.java
index 482af17..a1a6d5a 100644
--- a/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/chunkio/ChunkIOProvider.java
+++ b/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/chunkio/ChunkIOProvider.java
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ class ChunkIOProvider implements AsynchronousExecutor.CallBackProvider<QueuedChu
continue;
}
- Chunk neighbor = queuedChunk.provider.getChunkIfLoaded(chunk.locX + x, chunk.locZ + z);
+ Chunk neighbor = queuedChunk.provider.getLoadedChunkAtWithoutMarkingActive(chunk.locX + x, chunk.locZ + z); // Paper
if (neighbor != null) {
neighbor.setNeighborLoaded(-x, -z);
chunk.setNeighborLoaded(x, z);
Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/spigotmc/ActivationRange.java b/src/main/java/org/spigotmc/ActivationRange.java
index daed1db..ba60f1a 100644
--- a/src/main/java/org/spigotmc/ActivationRange.java
+++ b/src/main/java/org/spigotmc/ActivationRange.java
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ public class ActivationRange
int x = MathHelper.floor( entity.locX );
int z = MathHelper.floor( entity.locZ );
// Make sure not on edge of unloaded chunk
- Chunk chunk = entity.world.getChunkIfLoaded( x >> 4, z >> 4 );
+ Chunk chunk = entity.world.getChunkIfActive( x >> 4, z >> 4 ); // Paper
if ( isActive && !( chunk != null && chunk.areNeighborsLoaded( 1 ) ) )
{
isActive = false;
Optimize Chunk Unload Queue Removing chunks from the unload queue when performing chunk lookups is a costly activity. It drastically slows down server performance as many methods call getChunkAt, resulting in a bandaid to skip removing chunks from the unload queue. This patch optimizes the unload queue to instead use a boolean on the Chunk object itself to mark if the chunk is active, and then insert into a LinkedList queue. The benefits here is that all chunk unload queue actions are now O(1) constant time. A LinkedList will never need to resize, and can be removed from in constant time when used in a queue like method. We mark the chunk as active in many places that notify it is still being used, so that when the chunk unload queue reaches that chunk, and sees the chunk became active again, it will skip it and move to next.
2016-03-18 23:03:44 +01:00
--
Improve chunk unload queue to maintain some previous expectations While the previous logic was logically correct, some CB API's before would request a chunk without removing it from the unload queue. While this is logically wrong, some plugins seem to be causing unload issues. This change will make anything using that one API that use to not remove from queue, no longer remove from queue. Hopefully other activities on the server will touch the chunk if it REALLY is in use.
2016-03-20 05:13:20 +01:00
2.7.4
Optimize Chunk Unload Queue Removing chunks from the unload queue when performing chunk lookups is a costly activity. It drastically slows down server performance as many methods call getChunkAt, resulting in a bandaid to skip removing chunks from the unload queue. This patch optimizes the unload queue to instead use a boolean on the Chunk object itself to mark if the chunk is active, and then insert into a LinkedList queue. The benefits here is that all chunk unload queue actions are now O(1) constant time. A LinkedList will never need to resize, and can be removed from in constant time when used in a queue like method. We mark the chunk as active in many places that notify it is still being used, so that when the chunk unload queue reaches that chunk, and sees the chunk became active again, it will skip it and move to next.
2016-03-18 23:03:44 +01:00
In neuem Issue referenzieren Permalink kopieren