3
0
Mirror von https://github.com/PaperMC/Paper.git synchronisiert 2024-11-15 04:20:04 +01:00
Paper/patches/server/0747-Configurable-chat-thread-limit.patch
Bjarne Koll 7df472527f
Configurable damage tick when blocking with shield (#10877)
A long standing bug in spigot and its derivatives was the fact that
players taking damage while blocking with a shield would not receive
invulnerability, while they do in vanilla.

This enabled the pvp technique of disabling a shield and immediately
attacking again to knock a player into the air.
While upstream fixed this and properly aligned itself with vanilla
damage logic (in this specific case) changing such long standing
behaviour has some downsides.

To allow players used to this specific bug to still use it, this patch
introduces a configuration option to re-introduce said bug.
As there is no easy way to *only* re-add this bug, the option is found
in the unsupported section as it may introduce other damage related
disparity from vanilla.
2024-06-15 23:17:51 +02:00

48 Zeilen
3.0 KiB
Diff

From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shane Freeder <theboyetronic@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 06:33:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Configurable chat thread limit
By default, spigot shifts chat over to an unbounded thread pool,
on a normal server, this really offers no gains, the creation of a thread
on submitting to the pool on these servers eats more time vs just running it in
the netty pipeline, however, on servers using plugins which do work in here, there
could be some overall benefits to moving this stuff outside of the pipeline.
In general, this patch does two things:
1) Exposes the core size for the pool, this allows for ensuring that a number of threads
sit around in the pool, mitigating the need for creating new threads; This IS however
caveated, the ThreadPoolExecutor will ONLY create core threads as they're needed, it
just won't allow for us to dip back under the # of core threads, this can potentially
be mitigated by calling prestartCoreThread, however, I'm not sure if there is much justification
for this
2) Exposes a max size for the pool, as stated, by default this is unbounded, for most
servers limiting the size of the pool is going to have 0 effects given how fast chat
is actually processed, this is honestly really just exposed for the misnomers or people
who just wanna ensure that this won't grow over a specific size if chat gets stupidly active
diff --git a/src/main/java/io/papermc/paper/configuration/GlobalConfiguration.java b/src/main/java/io/papermc/paper/configuration/GlobalConfiguration.java
index 7045040681e639f36fefcf2735f67367d5e3cbc4..cc847dce0116b8260790b890b1d5452c280e186c 100644
--- a/src/main/java/io/papermc/paper/configuration/GlobalConfiguration.java
+++ b/src/main/java/io/papermc/paper/configuration/GlobalConfiguration.java
@@ -287,7 +287,18 @@ public class GlobalConfiguration extends ConfigurationPart {
@PostProcess
private void postProcess() {
- // TODO: fill in separate patch
+ //noinspection ConstantConditions
+ if (net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.getServer() == null) return; // In testing env, this will be null here
+ int _chatExecutorMaxSize = (this.chatExecutorMaxSize <= 0) ? Integer.MAX_VALUE : this.chatExecutorMaxSize; // This is somewhat dumb, but, this is the default, do we cap this?;
+ int _chatExecutorCoreSize = Math.max(this.chatExecutorCoreSize, 0);
+
+ if (_chatExecutorMaxSize < _chatExecutorCoreSize) {
+ _chatExecutorMaxSize = _chatExecutorCoreSize;
+ }
+
+ java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor executor = (java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor) net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.getServer().chatExecutor;
+ executor.setCorePoolSize(_chatExecutorCoreSize);
+ executor.setMaximumPoolSize(_chatExecutorMaxSize);
}
}
public int maxJoinsPerTick = 5;